Tank was gay

[St. Matthew]

<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times" at
him....>>


That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

[Bachophile]

Post by St. Matthew
<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times"
at him....>>
That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

Yeah sure buddy, if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just
haven't seen as much as I have.

[Logan]

sounds like you can't simply tell the difference from caring for a team mate
and gay desire..

Post by Bachophile

Post by St. Matthew
<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times"
at him....>>
That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

Yeah sure buddy, if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just
haven't seen as much as I have.

[Taste]

LMAO!!!! Is this a gay epidemic? I think Tank was more awed at the levels
Neo was able to achieve. He wasn't looking at Neo thinking "I wonder what
he looks like bent over a table." Please get it together people. :|

Post by Bachophile

Post by St. Matthew
<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times"
at him....>>
That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

Yeah sure buddy, if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just
haven't seen as much as I have.

[Knowledge]

I dunno, I think Bachophile might be onto something. Perhaps it was meant to
be the love for a comrad/teammate; but suppose the actor's true feelings
were emitted. After all, Marcus Chong was pretty gay with the Wachowskis
when he tried to squeeze more money out of them for the sequels =P

-Knowledge

Post by Taste
LMAO!!!! Is this a gay epidemic? I think Tank was more awed at the levels
Neo was able to achieve. He wasn't looking at Neo thinking "I wonder what
he looks like bent over a table." Please get it together people. :|

Post by Bachophile

Post by St. Matthew
<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times"
at him....>>
That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

Yeah sure buddy, if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just
haven't seen as much as I have.

[Melloccino]

Post by Knowledge
After all, Marcus Chong was pretty gay
with the Wachowskis when he tried to squeeze more money out of them
for the sequels =P

Okay, Knowledge, assuming any of the stories are true, I ask you why an
expectation for a large production studio/producers, to fulfil
contracted financial obligations for sequels (i.e. fulfilling their end
of a contract) is 'gay'.

If anything--and again assuming the gossip is/was true--I'd say that
your concept of who was squeezing who is arse about face (wasn't the
*huge* sum less than $100k? I guess that'd really break the WB/WB
coffers, wouldn't it!).

M.
---

[Knowledge]

It is a matter of principle Mello, you should know that. He got greedy, as
far as i know. By the way, that post was meant to be completely sarcastic -
yet still believable ;-)

-Knowledge

Post by Melloccino

Post by Knowledge
After all, Marcus Chong was pretty gay
with the Wachowskis when he tried to squeeze more money out of them
for the sequels =P

Okay, Knowledge, assuming any of the stories are true, I ask you why an
expectation for a large production studio/producers, to fulfil
contracted financial obligations for sequels (i.e. fulfilling their end
of a contract) is 'gay'.
If anything--and again assuming the gossip is/was true--I'd say that
your concept of who was squeezing who is arse about face (wasn't the
*huge* sum less than $100k? I guess that'd really break the WB/WB
coffers, wouldn't it!).
M.
---

[St. Matthew]

Post by Knowledge
I dunno, I think Bachophile might be onto something. Perhaps it was meant to
be the love for a comrad/teammate; but suppose the actor's true feelings
were emitted. After all, Marcus Chong was pretty gay with the Wachowskis
when he tried to squeeze more money out of them for the sequels =P

Oh, geez, that again!? >:(

[St. Matthew]

Post by Taste
LMAO!!!! Is this a gay epidemic? I think Tank was more awed at the levels
Neo was able to achieve.

That's right. His enthusiasm was held back because he wanted to know
for certain that Morpeus was right about The One.

[itISme]

Post by Bachophile

Post by St. Matthew
<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times"
at him....>>
That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

Yeah sure buddy, if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just
haven't seen as much as I have.

anyone who likes Bach as much as this one....is into "simple" things, so I'd
venture that the individual hasn't sufficient powers of discernment......

[Melloccino]

Post by itISme

Post by St. Matthew
but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting
times" at him....
... if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just haven't
seen as much as I have.

anyone who likes Bach as much as this one....is into "simple" things,
so I'd venture that the individual hasn't sufficient powers of
discernment......

Hey, telmaH, I look at it this way:- we each offer to this forum insight
into those things of which we are most knowledgable/ interested.

Sandman might offer computer-oriented insight, while Knowledge might
offer insight into theological symbols in the trilogy. JPM is into
political & social commentary, and so on.

I guess noone's ever offered such expert commentary on the gay symbols
in the trilogy, as both 'Bachophile' or 'Pablo Rena' recently have,
because none of we long-term contributors have been experienced to, or
are otherwise as interested in, such a lifestyle or the symbols it
holds.

So I applaud each of them for bringing their own experiences and
expertise to the forum. "Bravo for the insight into the well-spotted gay
symbols" I say.
--
M.
----

[Knowledge]

lol, too funny Mello. Good show!

-Knowledge

Post by Melloccino

Post by itISme

Post by St. Matthew
but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting
times" at him....
... if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just haven't
seen as much as I have.

anyone who likes Bach as much as this one....is into "simple" things,
so I'd venture that the individual hasn't sufficient powers of
discernment......

Hey, telmaH, I look at it this way:- we each offer to this forum insight
into those things of which we are most knowledgable/ interested.
Sandman might offer computer-oriented insight, while Knowledge might
offer insight into theological symbols in the trilogy. JPM is into
political & social commentary, and so on.
I guess noone's ever offered such expert commentary on the gay symbols
in the trilogy, as both 'Bachophile' or 'Pablo Rena' recently have,
because none of we long-term contributors have been experienced to, or
are otherwise as interested in, such a lifestyle or the symbols it
holds.
So I applaud each of them for bringing their own experiences and
expertise to the forum. "Bravo for the insight into the well-spotted gay
symbols" I say.
--
M.
----

[JPM III]

Post by Melloccino
Hey, telmaH, I look at it this way:- we each offer to this forum
insight into those things of which we are most knowledgable/
interested.
Sandman might offer computer-oriented insight, while Knowledge might
offer insight into theological symbols in the trilogy. JPM is into
political & social commentary, and so on.

You seem to be missing something: my five years of studying toward my first
bachelor's degree were for an information technology degree -- pure
computers. The socio-political commentary is entirely on the side, because I
like to think I possess a natural disposition to analyze and criticize it.
:-P

I now understand why Sandman and I don't seem to get along. Sandman and I
have varied knowledge concerning computers, and I choose Windows while he
chooses Mac. Everything else just reflects our opposing positions.

Post by Melloccino
I guess noone's ever offered such expert commentary on the gay symbols
in the trilogy, as both 'Bachophile' or 'Pablo Rena' recently have,
because none of we long-term contributors have been experienced to, or
are otherwise as interested in, such a lifestyle or the symbols it
holds.

Which is what Bachophile told us in his last post. If we don't see the GAY
that he sees, then we obviously haven't experienced as much homosexuality as
he has.

[Melloccino]

Post by Melloccino
Sandman might offer computer-oriented insight, while Knowledge might
offer insight into theological symbols in the trilogy. JPM is into
political & social commentary, and so on.

You seem to be missing something...

I missed nothing... 0=-|

... my five years of studying toward my first bachelor's degree
were for an information technology degree -- pure computers
... The socio-political commentary is entirely on the side...

... since I was speaking of the things that we normally bring here ("...
things we are most interested" i.e. on the side), as opposed to the
things we 'could' bring here ("... thing we are most knowledgable" e.g.
your I.T. knowledge).

In other words, I was pidgeon-holing you into a single-word slot, based
on the predominant theme from your many posts. I'm... a...
'reductionist'.

BTW, you're a lucky soul given that I mentioned you in lieu of [for
example] JW, telmaH, Gengon, or myself. =-P

I now understand why Sandman and I don't seem to get along. Sandman
and I have varied knowledge concerning computers, and I choose
Windows while he chooses Mac.

I suspect that if Sandman had to 'choose' a system he'd possibly go for
*NIX, even though he 'uses' a Mac for his more mainstream needs.
--
Melloccino
----------------------------------------
"The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of"

[JPM III]

Post by Melloccino
BTW, you're a lucky soul given that I mentioned you in lieu of [for
example] JW, telmaH, Gengon, or myself. =-P

Nah. As the unofficial, essentially powerless but always respected group
moderator, you wouldn't dare mention one of us and not the other. At least,
not until one of us made a statement like the one I just made. :-)

Post by Melloccino

Post by JPM III
I now understand why Sandman and I don't seem to get along. Sandman
and I have varied knowledge concerning computers, and I choose
Windows while he chooses Mac.

I suspect that if Sandman had to 'choose' a system he'd possibly go
for *NIX, even though he 'uses' a Mac for his more mainstream needs.

As you say, possibly. Confident, much?

I stick to Windows because it's what I'm forced to use at work and at
school. It just makes better since that way. Besides, I understand the
Windows operating systems, so I like (most of) them.

[St. Matthew]

Post by Bachophile

Post by St. Matthew
<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times"
at him....>>
That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

Yeah sure buddy, if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just
haven't seen as much as I have.

Oh, I suspect I've seen as much -- or more. I think what you're
seeing is excellent chemistry between two tremendously talented
actors. I think both actors, as human beings, have tremendous
emotional depth. Good! :)

[Knowledge]

So you're saying they're both gay???

-Knowledge

Post by St. Matthew

Post by Bachophile

Post by St. Matthew
<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times"
at him....>>
That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

Yeah sure buddy, if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just
haven't seen as much as I have.

Oh, I suspect I've seen as much -- or more. I think what you're
seeing is excellent chemistry between two tremendously talented
actors. I think both actors, as human beings, have tremendous
emotional depth. Good! :)

[St. Matthew]

Post by St. Matthew

Post by Bachophile

Post by St. Matthew
<<but he looked quite LONGINGLY at Neo and said what "exciting times"
at him....>>
That is his love for ZION which you are mistaking as something else.

Yeah sure buddy, if you can't see GAY longing in those eyes, you just
haven't seen as much as I have.

Oh, I suspect I've seen as much -- or more. I think what you're
seeing is excellent chemistry between two tremendously talented
actors. I think both actors, as human beings, have tremendous
emotional depth. Good! :)

So you're saying they're both gay???>>

Definitively: no.